소개

Across Protocol은 속도와 자본 효율성에 최적화된 크로스체인 브리지로, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, zkSync, Linea를 포함한 이더리움과 그 레이어 2 네트워크 간의 빠른 자산 이전을 가능하게 합니다. Across는 릴레이어가 사용자의 브리지 주문을 이행하기 위해 경쟁하는 인텐트 기반 아키텍처를 사용하여, 표준 브리지 최종성 기간을 기다릴 필요 없이 거의 즉각적인 이전을 제공합니다. 이 프로토콜은 결제 검증을 위해 UMA의 옵티미스틱 오라클로 보호됩니다. Across는 생태계에서 가장 낮은 브리지 수수료와 가장 빠른 이전 시간을 갖춘 것으로 알려져 있어, 이더리움 L2 간에 자주 자산을 이동하는 사용자들에게 인기가 있습니다.

DeFi

Across enables capital-efficient cross-chain transfers between Ethereum L2s with low fees and fast finality through competitive relayer-based bridging.

DeFi Infrastructure

Across Protocol is a fast cross-chain bridge using intent-based architecture for near-instant transfers between Ethereum and its L2 networks.

Token Info ACX

Blockchain Ethereum

Data updated Feb 15 · Source: Statility

4.3
1 reviews
Transaction Speed
5
Fees & Costs
4.5
Security & Trust
4.5
Reliability & Liquidity
4
Supported Networks
3.5
Claude Opus 4.6
AI Review
4.3/5

Across Protocol stands out in the crowded cross-chain bridge space by leveraging an optimistic verification model with a network of relayers, which results in genuinely fast transfer times — often under a minute for supported routes. Built by the UMA team, it benefits from solid technical foundations and a focus on capital efficiency. The fee structure is competitive, frequently undercutting rivals on popular L2 routes like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. The interface is clean and straightforward, which is refreshing in DeFi. However, the supported chain and token selection, while growing, remains narrower than some competitors. The relayer model means liquidity can occasionally be thin for larger transfers or less popular routes. Smart contract risk is inherent, though Across has maintained a clean security record. For users primarily moving assets between Ethereum and major L2s, it's one of the best options available — fast, cheap, and reliable.

Pros
  • Very fast bridging times, often completing in under a minute
  • Consistently low fees compared to competing bridges
  • Strong technical pedigree from the UMA team with clean security track record
  • Clean, intuitive user interface that simplifies cross-chain transfers
Cons
  • Narrower chain and token support compared to more established multi-chain bridges
  • Large transfers may face liquidity constraints on less popular routes
  • Relayer-dependent model introduces some centralization trade-offs
Transaction Speed
5
Security & Trust
4.5
Fees & Costs
4.5
Reliability & Liquidity
4
Supported Networks
3.5
Feb 28, 2026
Across Protocol Screenshot

Added: Feb 15, 2026

across.to